patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Breakdown of North Reading Election Results

Incumbent Steve O'Leary and Water Commission Chairman Joe Foti won the election Tuesday.

 
0 of 0
From left to right: Poll workers Mary Lou Dysart, Margaret Isabelle and Sara Lamonica.
Photos (4)

Photos

The O'Leary family: Steve, Sue, Jimmy and Kevin.
Joe Foti and family.

Incumbent Steve O'Leary and Joe Foti won the election for Board of Selectmen on Tuesday. The seats for selectmen were the only ones contested.

Water Commission Chairman Joe Foti had 1,222 votes, Steve O'Leary gained 1,165 votes and former School Committee member Maureen Harty-Vacca collected 784 votes.

Here are the results for each precinct:

Candidate Total Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4
Steve O'Leary 1,165 308 188 297 372
Joe Foti 1,222 318 187 314 403
Maureen Harty-Vacca 784 162 136 209 277

Maureen Harty-Vacca said she may consider running again in the future.

Here are two profiles that will help you get to know your new selectmen better:

North Reading Selectman Candidate Profile: Steve O'Leary

North Reading Selectman Candidate Profile: Joe Foti

Related Topics: north reading elections and north reading selectmen

Mel Webster

10:59 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

I was shocked to see 599 blanks in a contested election. Curious as to why so many people decided to vote for only one candidate.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary B

2:16 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

That is not uncommon for people to only vote candidate when they can vote for more than one. Just think about it, if you only vote for the candidate you want, that will enable him/her to get a larger proportion of the votes. Thus giving him/her a better shot at winning.

I voted for only one candidate in this election, because I wanted to be sure he won one of the seats. By casting my ballot for only one my vote would not get diluted.

Comment_arrow

Barry

6:20 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Mel, it's called bullet voting, and it is a tactic that has been used forever.

Comment_arrow

Ed Canney

7:19 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Mel, I bulleted my candidate. It was perceived to be a close race, so if you preferred one over the other two, you only voted for them. Its more common if there are multiple candidates for one seat. But I agree, not the norm when two seats are available.

E

2:35 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Mel,
If you truly believe in one candidate's views over those of the other two, you should always cast one vote in a 3 for 2 race. Your unused vote (if cast) could potentially tip the scale in favor of either other candidate knocking your horse out of the race.
E

Reply

Ed Canney

7:08 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Barry, as others have posted , please say who you are. Most of us give our names along w/our opinions. Your posts always have a bit of a nasty flavor, i.e. your allegations regarding Maureen Vacca.

If you disagree with an opinion, just say so, sans the nastiness!

Reply

Mel Webster

12:21 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012

I understand bullet voting. I just think it is too bad when there are three qualified candidates and you are allowed to vote for two that so many people decide to choose only one. However, since only 17.83 percent of the town's registered voters could even see fit to get out and vote, I guess those that did take the time are allowed to vote in whatever way they want. At least all of you made the effort.

Reply

Leave a comment