Reading Could Receive $1.1 Million to Provide Free, Full-Day Kindergarten
Should the School Committee look for space for both the kindergarten and pre-K programs?
The town could receive $1.1 million in new Chapter 70 money from the state for offering free, full-day kindergarten, School Assistant Superintendent of Finance and Administration Mary DeLai told the School Committee Monday night.
Programs like all-day kindergarten are squeezing space in the town’s five elementary schools, according to the committee, which is looking at space options. One is a combined kindergarten and RISE early childhood education center on town-owned land on Oakland Road.
Future Chapter 70 funding would be subject to state legislative approval, DeLai told Patch.
Besides the Chapter 70 funds, a grant is available for communities transitioning to full-day kindergarten, DeLai said: $10,000 for each of Reading’s seven half-day kindergarten classes, or a total of $70,000. The grants are very competitive, she said, and based on a community’s need.
Once a community offers free, full-day kindergarten, another grant is available, she continued, at $10,000 per full-day kindergarten classroom. In Reading’s case, with 16 kindergarten classrooms, the amount would total $160,000.
Reading receives $800,000 in tuition from parents of full-day kindergartners, DeLai said: $4,200 per child.
Free, full-day kindergarten is a ”no brainer,” said committee member Rob Spadafora.
But Spadafora said he was “worried about making a full-court press” to the community for space for both full-day kindergarten and RISE.
The town is obligated to offer a preschool program for children with special needs starting at age three, DeLai told the committee.
Financially, the community might have to pay for students to attend a special ed program in another community, said Director of Student Services Alison Elmer if the program is not provided here. Further, if the town lacks space for typical students in the program, it will not receive tuition from them.
Reading will need 10 to 12 classrooms for RISE, Delai said, based on a projected enrollment of 200 students. Moving the program out of the high school would free space there for the “bubble” of students who will attend the high school next year, according to the discussion. New space for RISE would also bring students in that program at the Wood End Elementary School together and open 1.5 classrooms at Wood End.
Would the Massachusetts School Building Authority help fund a pre-school?
“They didn’t say ‘no,’” school Superintendent John Doherty told the committee. The agency has not funded a building for pre-kindergartners, said DeLai. A community does not go to the school building authority with a building plan, she said. Rather, you show them how your space does not accommodate your education plan, she said, and work with them to resolve that issue.
A modular pre-kindergarten and kindergarten could cost between $9 million and $11.2 million, DeLai said. That figure does not include the cost of land. She recommended that the committee members visit a modular preschool in North Andover that didn’t feel, she said, like a modular building.
The committee is scheduled to meet next on Aug. 27 to further discuss the school space issue and to explore modifying the town’s capital plan, which includes $400,000 to buy modular classrooms this fiscal year, which will end on June 30, 2013, as a long-term solution to space squeeze. The school department could rent modulars, short-term, and use some of the money for a feasibility study for kindergarten and RISE space.
Rob
7:49 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
So if there's such a budget crisis in this state, how do they keep coming up with money for things like this, then tell us they'll have to cut local aid. This amounts to free day care for two income families, many of which in Reading would have no problem coming up with the $4,200.
Sara
8:11 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Excuse me. Not all two income Reading families can come up with $4,200. I know mine can't. Free full day kindergarten would be excellent. Reading already has one of the most expensive tuitions in the state.
Melissa
8:35 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
This has nothing to do with people using this as "free daycare". My daughter's birthday makes it so she will almost be 6 when entering kindergarten and if the half day kindergarten continues in Reading she would almost be going backwards (in terms of hours in school) from preschool so we would almost be forced to pay for full day kindergarten. I think it is a great idea.
sonny
8:50 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Why does Reading want to be in the pre-school business. There are many, many private pre-schools in the area that are excellent. Why are we using classroom space for pre-school. If the answer is that it is required for children with special needs then limit it to that.
George
4:03 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012
Kindergarten is not pre school.
Joe
9:17 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
This seems to be a great idea to me. Reading's school system is why most of us live in the community and why our property values are so high. This will make our school system better and that is what makes the town better. I totally agree with Melissa about the students going backwards after pre-school. If the funds are there, then we must do it. The long term benefits will pay off for everyone involved.
Rob
10:45 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Sara - I didn't say all, I said many. Why should the taxpayers across the state pay for this? If we think it's important, then either the parents or the town of Reading should be paying for it. Not taxpayers in other (especially less affluent) towns.
M
10:52 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Sonny, the thing with the special needs preschool is that it is required (by state law I think?) to be an "integrated" preschool, about 50-50 special needs & non, so for the increase in special needs there is a corresponding increase in regular students. Moreover, the special needs keeds get preschool free @ rise, regardless of income. I know my 2 non-special needs kids could not even get into the slots @ Rise for regular kids (there is a lottery), so we went to a more expensive preschool.
One thing folks should realize is that Reading really is in the minority as far as not having free full day K , which about 80% of the communities in Mass already offer, including our neighboring towns of Melrose, Wilmington, and Woburn . My youngest is attending full day K in Reading starting next month, and I would LOVE it if they could somehow get that $1mil immediately. An existing full day K teacher in Reading has told me that the $800K collected in tuition is not even spent on the full day K program at all, she gets no extra aides, supplies or space or anything. Rather, it is used to balance other parts of the budget. As far as the $4200, we are close to the highest charged in the state ($4400 in Andover), for those places that do charge. Incidentally, wealthier towns like Lexington and Winchester charge under $2k for full day K.
Maureen
11:47 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Property value is directly related to the success of a school system! Of course it will benefit our children to provide full-day services. After all these years, it's difficult to hear people refer to education as "free day-care". A day in a kindergarten classroom would solve that misconception problem. I, for one, believe our children deserve every possible advantage we can offer. (No, I have no school age children or grandchildren who will be involved. Yes, I have many years experience in the education field.)
Thomas J. Ryan
3:32 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Definition of 'free': without cost or payments.
It will be interesting to see how the School Committee and the School Department will give the Town of Reading full-day kindergarten without costs or payments.
As Milton Friedman, the economist, is quoted as saying, "There's no such thing as a free lunch."
tobus
Karl Weld
4:19 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
2 1/2 override needed for library renovation and expansion - $6 million. Total price: $11 million (state pays $5 million i believe). If a new school, housing pre-school and full-time kindergarten, can be built for less than $30 million in this state I'll be shocked. If the state picks up half, that leaves at least another $15 million in override money to be collected. And we still have around $30 million in unfunded pension and benefits liabilities on the books. (Yikes!) Not so free, indeed.
M
4:55 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Why does full day K have to require a new building, necessarily? I saw the space study articles, but they kept lumping in Kindergarten with RISE. Separately, could the the Kindergarten as full day be housed in the existing elementary schools? Also, to correct a stat I quoted earlier, although 83% of the students in MA are enrolled in full day K, only 65% of the districts offer it for free. Nonetheless, how do these districts, many of them with modest means like Woburn, Burlington, Medford, Wilmington, Melrose, etc., and even smaller wealthier towns like Topsfield, Swampscott, manage to fit universal free K it in their budgets. And places like Lynnfield, Lexington, Winchester, Saugus, all charge under $2k. Reading seems to be an outlier.
Karl Weld
3:58 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012
So the school department made the decision to allow EVERY applicant for full-day kindergarten to be accepted. So much for a lottery. It seems they've made the decision to go to full-day all on their own. What this means for Birch Meadow is that there are 2 full-day classes and one half-day. The half-day teacher will split with Birch Meadow and another half-day class in another school. That will be bad for the teacher and for the half-day kids affected. I thought the policy was one full-day and two half-day classes per school. When did the school department decide that that policy was no longer valid? And when were they going to inform the public?
Fred Van Magness Sr.
8:55 pm on Monday, July 30, 2012
It is unfortunate that Reading is turning into a community of "have's" and "have not's" concerning full day kindergarten. Those who can afford to pay, can get full day education and those with limited funds get half day. Where is there EQUALITY in this kindergarten process ? EVERY youngster should have the same opportunity regardless of parental income. If half day kindergarten is considered sufficient, then why are we offering full day at all? If there is an educational benefit to full day, then why are we allowing only some to get the advantage. In Birch Meadow, 2/3rd of the kids will have a full day experience and 1/3rd are left out on their own. We should not have it both ways and must do better. Have we lost our values...? If, as a town, we cannot afford to provide full day for all, then we need to only provide half day.
Emily M
12:37 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012
but.. but.. that's socialist!! all of us contributing so that kids of all economic backgrounds can get the same education?? THAT'S CRAZY.
Nikki
2:14 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Fred, imo that 1/3 is better off. A half day of kindergarten, and then go home to (hopefully) a parent. A full day of school for a five year old is sad...
John
9:34 pm on Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Great point Emily!! Doesn't sound like the usual Reading Republican Town Committee stance, does it?
Emily M
8:55 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012
everyone's ok with socialist policies when it doesn't affect them directly. substitute 'health care' for 'kindergarten' and we'd have people burning things and riots in the streets
Reading Republican Town Committee
11:16 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012
FYI, Fred is not a member of the RRTC. Speaking to Emily's post about socialism: Education should be a local issue. What we oppose are mandates (usually unfunded) from the State and Federal government that impose policies that our community may not agree with, or have the ability to pay for. If Reading decides that it is in the best interests of our children, and something we are willing to pay for, then so be it. As part of the civil society, we have an obligation to do what WE decide is best for our community and fund it appropriately. Different communities will have different priorities and should be free to operate the way they see fit. That is not socialism.
Rob
7:18 am on Wednesday, August 1, 2012
I agree with Nikki. Full day kindergarten is just a few extra hours of play time. My kids both went to 1/2 day and didn't miss anything.