Truck Exclusion Eyed for Parts of North Reading
Residents on Chestnut and New Streets petitioned for a truck exclusion.
Residents on Chestnut and New Streets submitted a petition for a truck exclusion in July 2010. Since then, the Police Department and DPW have done studies and come up with various options to deter the excessive heavy commercial traffic on these streets.
The average weekend truck traffic on New Street is 7.8 percent. The average weekday traffic is 10.4 percent. The average truck traffic on Chestnut Street is 6.1 percent on the weekend and 7 percent on weekdays. Those numbers exceed the state average of 5 percent.
Ninety-six percent of trucks use New Street for a cut through. Seventeen percent of the truck traffic is local, 56 percent is pass-through traffic and 27 percent was unidentifiable.
“This neighborhood does suffer from heavy commercial vehicle traffic,” said Sergeant Thomas Romeo.
According to DPW Director Dick Carnevale, there are a few options to defray traffic from these streets:
- Have truck traffic continue east on Park Street, and turn right onto Haverhill Street.
- Have truck traffic continue down Main Street to Franklin Street in Reading and cut over. This would require permission from Reading since Franklin Street is not a state numbered road.
- Have truck traffic continue down Main Street to Route 129 in Reading and then east bound to get to Route 128.
- Have truck traffic continue east on Route 62 toward Middleton, then Lynnfield, and then cut through Route 128.
- Have truck traffic use Route 93 via Concord Street.
- Another option is to make New Street a one way.
According to Police Chief Mike Murphy, a truck exclusion may displace the problem to another area. He suggested looking at the cost associated with installing raised crosswalks on Chestnut Street. Raised crosswalks have worked in other communities and may deter truck drivers from those roads.
"The ultimate goal is to put the truck traffic somewhere else,” said Selectman Sean Delaney.
The Board of Selectmen decided to schedule a public hearing during its second meeting in April. The meeting will posted in advance in our event calendar and on the town's website.
Dick Reiser
11:10 am on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Unfortunately, I don't see another viable option. Those local trucks need to use those roads.
Fred Chalmers
3:01 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
It's a NR problem. We shouldn't be considering solutions which simply move the problem to similar neighborhoods in surrounding communities.
Charles Durham
3:39 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Some of these people don't think about the end results. If they put no trucks signs on that part of Chestnut St. How will they get their trash picked up or get their home heating oil delivered. And if those signs go up and the police don't ticket the trash trucks or the oil deliveries than the town can and will be sued for discrimination.
Joe Veno
7:31 pm on Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Let me make a few comments on this. Any exclusions that are put on these streets is going to force the truck traffic to go by the two schools on Park street. You cannot put a truck exclusion on New Street and Chestnut street that leave the trucks with no place to go.They would nave to go up to Park street and past the schools.
If you think the intersection of Haverhill street and Park street are bad now just think what it will be like if all the trucks are forced to use it also. The truck exclusion would only be for trucks that were cutting through. Trucks that are making deliveries within the exclusion can still deliver to those houses and business.
Franklin Street in Reading is posted No Trucks already so that option is out. Making New street a one way only solves the problem in one direction. But it also sends the traffic to the intresection of Haverhill and Chestnut which we all know is a tough intersection now. Also if New street was made One Way that is for everyone including the residents. The Town can not be selective on who the One Way if for.
The one thing everyone has to remember on this issue is what ever is decided has to be approved by Mass Highway and they will not approve anythig that creates a safety hazzard or is not reasonable. Several of the choices I read above are not reasonable in my opinion and I do not beleive the State would approve them.