Town Meeting Adjourned

Is it time for North Reading to abandon the ancient Town Meeting in favor of a modern city government structure?

According to the official recap of the October 3 Town Meeting, there were 142 voters in attendance. Those 142 people voted to, among other things, approve the town’s $50,082,311 budget. So, in effect, each of them spent $352,692.33 of our hard-earned money. They represent about 1.35 percent of the town’s registered voters spending 100 percent of the town’s cash.

I’d like to applaud and thank those 142 people for giving their evening in the service of the town. On top of managing busy schedules, they somehow carved out enough time to participate in this 300 year-old New England form of pure democracy. I wasn’t one of them. I dozed off reading the meeting warrant so I figured I had little chance in the meeting itself. I didn’t bother trying to watch it on TV either – the excitement level combined with a recliner was just too much to even consider.

I’ve been to other Town Meetings though. I usually get drawn in by some issue that directly affects me or my family, often issues related to the schools. Such meetings typically draw a much larger attendance, sometimes even overflowing the capacity of the ’s auditorium. Some of these have had some real excitement too with heated debate and emotional demands for votes one way or the other. I’ve stood and spoken several times – tossing in my two cents before proudly raising my hand in support of one position or another.

You have to wonder about the true effectiveness of a these meetings. Decisions are made either by a piddling minority of the town’s population or by a plethora of passionate partisans often advocating for their own parochial pleas rather than making decisions based on objective criteria drawn from familiarity with the town’s affairs.  

According to William Francis Galvin’s Citizen's Guide to Town Meetings, “Here in this ancient American assembly, you can make your voice heard as you and your neighbors decide the course of the government closest to you.” It sounds very exciting but I wonder if a sleepy “ancient American assembly” that draws only 1.35 percent of its constituents is really the best way to run a modern community.

Before 1821, every municipality in Massachusetts was governed by Town Meeting. Since then, larger populations have been able to choose between Open Town Meetings, like North Reading’s, Representative Town Meetings, or City Governments. With more than 14,000 residents, North Reading qualifies to choose any of these.

Massachusetts General Laws, Part I, Title VII, Chapter 43 defines six possible structures for a city government. Each consists of some form of a council or commission and a mayor and/or a manager. The key difference between these and a Town Meeting is that the city leaders are running the affairs of the municipality on a continuous basis – not just when something perks their interest. They govern day to day, even when the topics are boring, gaining experience and competency throughout their terms, and are compelled do so in such a way as to be re-elected.

I wonder if we wouldn’t be better off with a few dedicated officials spending our $50 million rather than the 1.35 percent speaking for the other 98.65 percent of us. “The City of North Reading.” That sounds OK to me.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Barry October 12, 2011 at 09:02 PM
John, the annual budget is approved at the spring meeting. The October meeting just dealt with some amendments to the budget. So to say that the 142 attendees each "spent $352,692.33 of our hard-earned money" is fatuous.
John Intorcio October 13, 2011 at 02:38 AM
Barry: I'm often fatuous - particularly after eating pepperoni or beans. But I think you're missing the point of the post.
Norcam Rob October 14, 2011 at 06:35 PM
My last thought on this, when was the last time you heard about a corrupt Town Meeting VS how many times have you heard of a corrupt City Council? Hmmmm... I have heard of no corrupt Town Meetings myself, yet all we have to do is read the Boston Herald or even the Boston Phoenix to hear about the crap that goes on in Boston. There'd be an awful lot of shirts to stuff with money like Chuck and Diane...
Monica Gregoire October 15, 2011 at 10:10 PM
There are different variations of Town Meeting that are permitted under Massachusetts law. Representative Town Meeting is an option that should be considered. This form is great because the number of representatives at the meeting would be proportional to our population. Plus we would decide who would represent us and these people would then have to answer to the voters. Our system does not have to be scrapped, just tweaked to meet the needs of modern day North Reading.
Joe Veno October 15, 2011 at 11:08 PM
Represenative Town meeting is the worst type there is. Please talk to some people who lives in a town that has it and see what they say. I mean talk to a LOTof people in a town that has it like I have. Please do your homework before you propose changes...


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »