.

Stoneham Schools Employee Allegedly Pretended to Be 14 to Solicit Nude Photo of Teen Girl

The defendant, a Framingham man, has been placed on administrative leave from Stoneham Public Schools.

A Stoneham Public Schools employee was charged with posing a child in the nude after he allegedly pretended to be a 14-year-old boy and solicited indecent images from a 15-year-old girl in Maine.

Steven C. Orloff, 47, 189 Potter Road, of Framingham, was arraigned Wednesday in Framingham District Court on charges of distribution of obscene matter and pose or exhibit a child in the nude, said Middlesex District Attorney Gerry Leone in a press statement.

Framingham District Court Judge Robert Greco ordered the defendant held on $20,000 cash bail with conditions to commit no new crimes, no use of the Internet, stay away from Stoneham Public Schools, vacate his marital home, no contact with children under 18, and surrender his passport.

The defendant’s next court date is Jan. 14 for a probable cause hearing.

“This defendant used the Internet to solicit indecent images from a minor,” Leone said. “This is another stark reminder of how the Internet can be used by strangers to contact young, vulnerable victims and place them in dangerous situations. I applaud the coordinated efforts of the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office, Framingham Police and the Middlesex District Attorney’s Office that lead to the arrest of this defendant today.

According to authorities, the defendant began corresponding online with a 15-year-old female from Maine. The defendant told the victim he was a 14-year-old boy and they exchanged photos, though the defendant did not send an actual photo of himself. The victim and the defendant continued to chat online and the victim sent the defendant illicit photos of herself.

Orloff, who previously served as Arlington Public Schools' assistant director of special education for secondary students in 2011, was unanimously hired as the Stoneham Public Schools Director of Student Services at a salary of $102,000 in June 2011. 

According to a press release from the Middlesex DA's office, he works within the central office and did not have direct contact with students. He has been placed on administrative leave.

In an email to Stoneham Patch Wednesday night, Superintendent Les Olson issued a press statement about the Orloff case.

"This notice will confirm the information released by the Middlesex District Attorney’s office that Steven Orloff, an employee of the Stoneham Public Schools, was arrested (Wednesday) by the Framingham Police Department," reads the statement. "Mr. Orloff has been employed in an administrative capacity as the Director of Student Services and had not been assigned to provide any direct services to students.

"The Stoneham School Department has been cooperating with authorities in this investigation, and Mr. Orloff was placed on administrative leave on Tuesday when school officials became aware of the investigation. Mr. Orloff has been directed to have no contact with the Stoneham Public Schools, its staff, parents or students."

The investigation is ongoing. These charges are allegations and the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

The case is being prosecuted by Assistant District Attorney Tejal Mehta. The Victim Witness Advocate is Joanne Szeto.

Daniel DeMaina February 07, 2013 at 06:11 PM
A comment has been deleted for violation of our Terms of Use.
Stoneham Pride February 12, 2013 at 02:45 AM
Miss Jones, Comparing Stoneham to wealthier towns, like Lincoln-Sudbury, Weston, etc. is ignorant. Money does not always produce ethical, proactive people. In fact, many times, it does just the opposite. As one who has had experience with the Sudbury school system, I can say, without a doubt, that I am 100% happier with Stoneham. Leave the haughty attitude for coffee with your girlfriends.
Celia Jones February 12, 2013 at 10:51 PM
Stoneham Pride, You clearly have no children or no concern regarding this incident that Orloff is accused of & that Olson is defending. Let's stick to the subject as haughty attitude has nothing to do with this. I wouldn't consider Sudbury nor Lexington to be much wealthier than Stoneham. Money has nothing to do this with issue whatsoever. The issue here is that what Orloff did is disgusting & Olson is defending him. The parents need to be proactive. Glad you like your job though. Too bad you work for a Superintendent that isn't so committed to the students well being as most educator's are! No CORI on Orloff is a disgrace to this system!
Emma March 01, 2013 at 11:20 PM
This is very scary to read. I live in England and this story reminds me of Soham, two beautiful girls Holly and Jessica both died. The school caretaker was the killer, no background checks done. Search and read for yourselves. Someone must be accountable when cases like this arise.
Celia Jones March 20, 2013 at 11:48 PM
Sadly, there isn't just one victim here either, there are at least three as prosecutors have stated and most likely even more than that. No word from Olson on the topic though, again he manages to glide by. Sickening that Orson is not pressured in any way to explain how this disgusting individual was allowed to work within a public school setting without a CORI!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »