.

Police Caught Fuddruckers Serving Minor

Town to call in all liquor license holders for public hearing in November.

An underage buyer working for the Reading Police Department successfully bought a beer at earlier this month.

As a result, two workers lost their jobs, the restaurant will not be able to serve alcohol for three days next week and all liquor-selling establishments will have to appear before the board of selectmen in November to renew their licenses this year.

At a time when the Reading community is in town—and when the town for the same violation—Selectman James Bonazoli said that it may help to bring liquor sellers in to further that dialogue.

He noted that bar and liquor store owners often say that they are aware of the Reading Coalition Against Substance Abuse, “[but] none of them have ever showed up at any RCASA meeting to my knowledge.”

Selectmen Steve Goldy confirmed that assumption.

Bonazoli said that he also saw it as an opportunity to find out what the town could do to ease the license-holders’ job of preventing underage sales, but expressed concern about how Fuddruckers’ prevention procedures broke down.

The incident

Christopher Latham, the lawyer representing The Boland Group III (which operates the Fuddruckers), said that the restaurant had a “double-check policy.” Both the cashier selling the beer and the server delivering the beer were supposed to check the underage customer’s ID, he said.

But, according to Sgt. Det. Mark Segalla of the Reading Police Department, the department’s plant on the night of Sept. 9 entered the restaurant, asked for a beer and was then sent to a table. A server brought the beer to the table, he said, and then asked for the customer’s ID. The customer didn’t have identification, and the server left.

“The cashier entered a false date of birth in the register,” Latham said. The server, he said, relied on the cashier to do his job.

Both, he said, were fired following an internal investigation. All operation managers working that night were also given a notice of warning that was added to their employee file, he said.

Karl Weld September 21, 2011 at 03:46 PM
There isn't a policy or process that will solve the problem of those responsible for implementing the policy or process from not doing so. The server should've denied service because of lack of ID. Period. The cashier should've denied service because of lack of ID. Period. Both have been fired for failing to follow the policy or process. A new policy or process will not keep this from happening again. You can't legislate people to do their job. You can only punish them if they don't. The employees have paid for their actions, as will the employer. What this has to do with RCASA is beyond my comprehension. This was stupidity. And you can't legislate or group-hug that away.
PhilZ September 21, 2011 at 06:48 PM
Don't the police have better things to do? With the hundred our so break in's in Reading this year, you would think that would take priority. Are they even trying? You would think some of these criminals are in the system and you'd get a match on fingerprints. But don't dare to speed down route 28.
John P. September 22, 2011 at 03:24 AM
I hope everyone ignores the comment by PhilZ
Dave Miskinis September 22, 2011 at 01:00 PM
PhilZ who????

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something