Was Romney Right About the 47 Percent, or Will This Doom His Campaign?

Mother Jones released a video of Mitt Romney telling a private audience that 47 percent of Americans are dependent on the government and will never vote for him. Was this a ruinous gaffe, or has Romney told a hard political truth?

A secret video obtained by Mother Jones magazine has rocked the political world. In that video, Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney said 47 percent of Americans believe they are victims, are dependent on the government and will never vote for him. He went further, saying he wasn't worried about them. The magazine released a portion of the video Monday.

In a late night press conference Monday, Romney said the comments were not "elegantly stated," but were part of a larger conversation about the role of personal responsibility. Romney went on to say the comments were a reflection on "the political process of winning an election, and, of course, I want to help all Americans—all Americans—have a bright and prosperous future."

Mother Jones posted the full video just after 2:30 p.m. Tuesday.

Also on Tuesday, Romney spoke to Fox News about the video, saying he agreed with military members and retirees not paying income taxes, but added, "I do believe that we should have enough jobs and enough take home pay such that people have the privilege of higher incomes that allow them to be paying taxes. I think people would like to be paying taxes […] The problem right now is, you see in this country so many people have fallen into poverty that they’re not paying taxes."

Do you think the video shows Romney's true feelings about half of the American electorate, or was this an out-of-context snippet? Will this hurt Romney's chances of willing the election, or is it one blip in a very long campaign? Tell us what you think in the comments below.

[Editor's note: This item is posted on several Patch sites in the area.]

lcgrz September 25, 2012 at 01:57 PM
uhhh, you mean the fees that mitt romney raised while he was governor?
Diana September 25, 2012 at 02:33 PM
A non-profit is not the same thing as a charity. Try to comprehend. Harvard is a non-profit, too.
Diana September 25, 2012 at 02:35 PM
I don't think that Dave's argument is that it's not tax-deductible, it's that no points will be awarded morally for giving to LDS. It's not a charitable institution.
Scot Sutherland September 25, 2012 at 03:28 PM
I thought Beatrice said we had to stop commenting on this issue.
Laura Savage-Carr September 26, 2012 at 11:38 PM
I'd rather have a leader that knows how to create wealth, instead of one that wants to spread the wealth of others around.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »