patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Historical Commission

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Board of Selectmen Approve Bandstand Concept; Spar with Historical Commission on Demolition Delay Appeals

The Reading Board of Selectmen rang in the new year with a full agenda on Tuesday night.

Meeting for the first time in 2012, the Reading Board of Selectmen tackled a full agenda at a lengthy meeting at the Town Hall on Tuesday night. Among the items up for discussion was a proposed bandstand in front of Town Hall and an actuarial study on “other post-employment benefits” (OPEB) presented by a consultant from the Segal Company. An instructional motion was put before the board to instruct the Historical Commission to draft a process allowing property owners to appeal the addition of their property to the list of historically significant structures subject to the demolition delay by-law. The board also voted to reappoint Gail Lapointe as Town Accountant, with a term expiring on June 1, 2012, or until a successor can be appointed …

George

10:59 am on Monday, January 16, 2012

The Board of Selectmen continually revisits old decisions with no valid reason. The Bandstand issue was resolved years ago when the proponents of the bandstand were denied the approval to put a bandstand on the town Hall Lawn or the common. The proponents were told that Memorial Park was the best place for a Bandstand and the Town would willignly approve them building their project there but they…   more ›

Friday, November 18, 2011

Town Meeting Rejects Effort to Weaken Demolition Delay

Article 27 panned as poorly written, inconsistent.

An effort to make it easier to bypass the Reading Historical Commission’s ability to delay the demolition of historical structures failed Thursday. At the second day of Town Meeting, David Mancuso of Making Reading Better presented article 27, which he crafted with the intent to create a simple process to appeal the delay. As he described it, an impacted homeowner could write a letter, appear before the Board of Selectmen, argue his or her case and receive a verdict. But the article’s opponents, including the historical commission and the bylaw committee, panned article 27 as poorly written, inaccurate and inconsistent with its intent. In response, Town Meeting Member John Carpenter asked the bylaw committee for more specific criticism. “…

John Carpenter

10:42 am on Saturday, November 19, 2011

I was disappointed in the Bylaw Committee's vague dismissal, and the Historical Commission's claims, which misrepresented how the draft bylaw had been developed. If there's another meeting on this topic with the Historical Commission, we should ensure that it is an open meeting, and several Town Meeting members should attend to hear what is actually said, and see how constructive the Commission's…   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?